This piece by Paul Strangio is right on the money.
Labor has taken the left for granted and while this hasn’t cost them government it has cost them desperately needed public support. Last Federal election some Labor campaign organisers told me they secretly voted for the Greens. Campaign organisers live and breathe election campaigns, they put in hours and hours and hours of work – their social lives, their homes, their weekends, their evenings, their families, all become completely tied up in the cause. So, things are bad when they are sick of it enough to vote for another team.
You would not believe it right now, but Labor is actually quite good at the passionate policy debate (think of Keating’s Redfern speech); in terms of swinging voters it’s one of their strengths. The necessary swagger comes easily to them. Right now the ALP is attempting to mimic its own righteous outrage for current debates, but it either hasn’t the high moral ground or hasn’t the honest belief to carry it off. It can be nauseating to watch.
Over the last thirty years the Labor Party’s big policy ideas have far outnumbered the Coalition’s, but the wretchedness of the asylum seeker political debate threatens to permanently diminish not only the Labor Party’s core values but this country’s international standing. With a minority government and a relentless news cycle this is undoubtedly a tough time to be in power, and the Labor Party is still fighting some worthy and difficult battles – the mining tax, the carbon tax, the disability insurance scheme – but they have upstaged themselves with a Howard-era small-mindedness. You can’t out-conservative a conservative like the Opposition Leader, but you can lose your lefty supporters.
The kind of caustic misogyny being levelled at Gillard from the right should be appalling enough to muster support for her from the liberal left. It is the kind of noise the Labor government could do with. Passionate liberal left supporters are manna from heaven in the public arena – tireless, vocal, compelling, switched-on and well-informed – they can end up dominating a discussion even when up against the forces of a conservative media. In the United States of America there is evidence that the right have to hire people to pretend to be right-wing commenters in order to keep up with the genuine enthusiasm and activism of the left in on-line media.
But that defence for Gillard isn’t happening, as Strangio notes …
There are some uncomfortable questions raised by the hostility to Gillard. Where does the loathing spring from and has it got something to do with her gender and status as an unmarried woman? The other notable thing is that amid this campaign of calumny against the Prime Minister, she and her government have been relatively friendless. If, as the conservatives insist, the liberal left still dominates Australia’s cultural institutions, it has been conspicuously mute in defending Labor since the party entered office in 2007. When the Whitlam Labor government was under siege by 1974-75 from the opposition and a host of vested interests, it at least had partisans to spring to its side.
Perhaps this is another danger of the ALP’s progressive alienation of the liberal left over recent years, and the misguided calculation that it would not matter. For while the liberal left has either deserted Labor or cooled in its ardour to the point of indifference to the Gillard government’s fate, Labor’s haters are no less passionate.
Cross-posted at Hoyden About Town.


I have no doubt that much of the loathing of Gillard stems from pure misogyny, but I suspect that the reason that I and other women like me don’t leap to her defence is because of our sense of betrayal, despair and utter dismay at, amongst other things, the ALP position on asylum seekers, gay marriage, funding for schools and so on. If it is true, as is often reported, that Gillard is most especially disliked by women, I wonder if that is because we are the most disappointed that, having finally, finally got a female PM, we have seen the paradigm shift not one inch.
Yep exactly. WTF happened? is what I want to ask her. I don’t hate her but I’m severely disappointed.
I also hate this rushing for the vote of conservative groups. Lefties do get taken for granted in their views/support. I find this even more interesting when you consider that most lefties are concerned about vulnerable groups in society. If parties aren’t concerned about the lefty vote, then that is even less attention on the vulnerable groups…
I agree julie…it seems incredibly false for me to try and celebrate the ascencion of a woman to the prime ministerial-ship when it came in part from her appeal to many conservative voters who supported a shift to policies which further tarnished our human rights and equal opportunities record (which I m surprised is even possible! I remember wearing my ‘free the refugee shirts and badges at high school ten years ago!). But the reaction in the media (including that god-awful ‘at home with julia’) has been pretty extreme.
Thanks for the post blue milk…it is indeed ‘nauseating to watch’ the political arena at times, but I am glad you are on the job so you can give is such succinct assessments of it!
Since Gillard has been PM what left policy has she championed apart from the carbon policy instigated by the Greens?
Where has her government differentiated itself from Abbott’s opposition “on asylum seekers, gay marriage, funding for schools and so on”? Actually with asylum seekers and the ‘Malaysia solution’, the government is worse than the opposition.
Does Gillard really believe that by opposing gay marriage she is going to win votes from the Australian Christian Lobby and its followers? And her very obvious position of sinking any chance of gay marriage getting through the parliament by endorsing a conscious vote is reminiscent of Howard’s sneaky scuttling of the republic vote.
Yes, there is a lot of misogyny but I think it’s coming from the right and that’s whose playground she is insistent on being allowed to play in. By showing some strength on left issues I really believe Gillard and her government will win votes not lose them. Look at the small rise in the polls following the passing of the carbon legislation despite other polls showing supporters of it being in a minority (albeit a large one).
Gillard can start by making gay marriage a binding vote on all ALP parliamentarians next month.
The mining tax and the disability insurance scheme are both what I would consider to be left policy.
But I totally agree with you about her ridiculous opposition to gay marriage and the way she has been treating the schooling sector in general, including the absurdly blunt teacher bonus scheme that she wants to introduce.
I have written about her opposition to gay marriage before and why I just can’t understand it – http://bluemilk.wordpress.com/2010/08/12/from-one-heterosexual-de-facto-to-another/
And I also agree with you that championing some of these left policies would actually be vote winners.
This doesn’t help her cause:
“Meanwhile, Julia Gillard has not yet held the dinner with gay couples she promised after the activist group GetUp! paid more than $31,000 in an auction at the Press Gallery ball in June. GetUp!’s Simon Sheikh said the dinner should be held before the national conference.”
http://www.theage.com.au/national/left-figures-oppose-conscience-vote-on-gay-marriage-20111109-1n7fg.html#ixzz1dEyZ9PHx
[...] in order to keep up with the genuine enthusiasm and activism of the left in on-line media." Blue Milk (see also: Craigslist ad for right-wing commenters draws suspicion and a few giggles, National [...]