(Would love to personally support them but they only sell to Sweden and the United States of America).
(Links via Welcome to dystopia).
Categories
Twitter: what can I say? Inane and pointless like everyone else’s.
Error: Please make sure the Twitter account is public.
Recent Comments
A flick of the pen -… on When mothers don’t love… Jo on Guest Post: Stepmothering and… Kenny dog on Rape scenes and how I watched… Ken dog on Don’t get raped 
Inversion Does Not E… on On vanity and princess cu… Kiwi Nick on Is this what happens when you… Flowers That Start W… on The city in purple Stephanie bowler on On perfectionism, scorn and… kwolicki on I have a piece in Senses of… Local SEO on There is always a story in you… i wrote this and stuff
The Internet’s Favourite blue milk Rants
Meta
Archives
Check out:
http://myus2.myus.com/
You can buy from any US shops via this site. It is briiiiiiiiliant!
jane x
I really like the clothes of Polarn O. Pyret and my son is actually wearing some of them. I have the feeling that in general the design of nordic childrens clothes (Urban Elk, Småfolk, Katviq, Ida K…etc.) can be described as pretty much unisex, most of the times the brands only mention the name of the clothes (e.g. sweater, pants, skirts) and not if it is intended for a girl or a boy to wear. I really like that, the only thing that I find a bit disturbing is that of course these beautiful clothes are rather pricy, which seems to just strengthen a separation by income, which means children of low-income families wear the usual pink vs. light-blue dichotomy, while the urban hipster kids are pretty much gender-neutral.
Agree on all counts with your comment.
My sister has bought my boys some gorgeous clothes from Polarn O. Pyret, they really are lovely. And I absolutely agree with the separation-by-income comments above.
So delicious…but so pricey. I mean, $30 for a onesie? Srsly???
Not that one person can make much of a difference re the income disparities spoken of above, but I’ve been sewing unisex clothes for kids lately… one item at a time. I send them out on a sliding scale. Pay what you can afford. The clothes my kids grow out of are donated to a local women’s and chlidren’s shelter.
That reminds me, I need to make up some skirts and have my son model. He loves them.
I’d love to see more unisex clothing. I truly wonder why this hasn’t caught on.
[…] This post was mentioned on Twitter by blue milk and Arwyn, Jennifer Doherty. Jennifer Doherty said: Not for girls. Not for boys. We make clothes for children. http://bit.ly/hyLeRA – Are there any stores like this in Oz? (via @bluemilk) […]
Agree with Mom in the North.
They also have a few shops around the UK.
Agree with all comments above.
This website is a pretty good example of the NZ version:http://www.naturebaby.co.nz/organic-cotton-c-152.html
…lots of beautiful clothes which in most cases are not gender-specific (even if in colour, not in stupid flowers and hearts embroidered on everything or dinosaurs and trucks etc etc), but very expensive. And I do get a bit tired of brown being the only non-blue/pink option (although I try to remind myself that buying pink for my daughter AND keeping it for future sons is more revolutionary than just avoiding pink!!)
oooh, naturebaby is WONDERFUL. Their woolen items for winter are unsurpassable.
why is my previous comment awaiting moderation : ( Have I been blacklisted already? And I have only just started following you…
Sorry Jane, over-zealous automatic spam filter. Your comment is back.
i noticed while shopping for my child this morning: boy (winter) clothes are thicker, warmer, and more practical than the equivalent products in the girl’s section. outerwear, pants, shirts, all of it.
thank goodness all girl toddlers want to do is huddle for warmth while the boys are playing outside! otherwise, this would be a real problem. sigh.
constant pink/purple/butterflies are bad enough. do the clothes actually have to functionally inferior as well?
sproutsmama, the less functional/sturdy aspect of girls and women’s clothing is absolutely real and starts at an early age and continues on into adulthood. It’s so irritating!
I was in a Gymboree the other day (I’m in the States) and once again hated gender dichotomy in children’s clothing. Thanks for this-and also for pointing out quality/function bias as well as just color/butterfly issues by the commenters
[…] its dominance. It is because there is an onslaught of hyper-masculinity coming Cormac’s way. Cormac’s masculinity, or the ‘cordial concentrate’ version of it anyway, is […]
[…] (Other stuff I have written on this topic: 1, 2, 3, […]
[…] I am interested. […]
[…] be bored with all the pink there soon enough but it is nice for a change… until one day when we finally get to a world where we don’t only have hyper-masculine and hyper-feminine clothing choices for little kids. […]